Who Should We Impeach Next?

It looks more and more like a weakness in the Constitution that says the House may impeach the president for crime or serious misconduct, but there is nobody who can impeach members of Congress for the same thing. Both houses can punish their own members, with expulsion being the strongest punishment, but that’s a little like having them vote on their own pay; they won’t vote against themselves. They’ve given themselves raises about 17 times since the last minimum wage was set in 1972. Well, great. No wonder the whole country is pissed off.

The problem here is that what is really needed is a body separate from Congress that can punish members of Congress for failing to do the duties they were elected to do. Like approving a budget, or raising the debt ceiling (which no other country else even has). Or maybe considering crucial appointments the president has proposed to fill administrative and court positions. Is it not the duty of Congress to either approve or reject each one, according to the Constitution? It is. But that’s not what they were doing before they swore to refuse to even consider any Supreme Court justice President Obama nominates, even before the nomination has been made. Like right now.

Doesn’t that sound like failure to perform their lawful duty? It does to me, but there doesn’t seem to be a way to remove the members responsible (which is all of the Republicans, actually)—in spite of the fact that there are seven years of this harmful failure to act. Clearly, this purposeful obstructionism is detrimental to the functioning of the republic.

What is it, exactly, that Republicans have been trying to accomplish? Is it to bring about the libertarian dream of no government, no controls on business, no environmental regulation, no minimum pay, and so on? It seems like it. I find it amazing that anyone at all would think this is a good idea, aside from Charles Koch, maybe. The very obvious result would be chaos and violence, economic and environmental destruction, not civilization, let alone democracy.

It is of little pleasure to me that Republicans are hoist by their own petard, from having cultivated a rabid right wing rebellion and associated racism for decades. They have brought to life a Frankenstein’s monster stiff-walking toward the election. Now that Donald Trump basically determines the direction of Republican policy, which he did by bellowing his hatred of immigrants and everyone else who isn’t a pure white American. Nor are the other Republican candidates any better. The three use their debate time to compare dicks and hatreds, rather than policy.

The only possible conclusion, given their failure to act at all, is that Republicans are acting against the good of the country. This becomes even more apparent when you read Jane Mayer’s Dark Money, which details the sordid history since WWII during which the Koch brothers and other billionaires enslaved the Republican Party and turned everything to the goal of unencumbered enrichment of billionaires, the public be damned. So now moderate Republicans, of whom there are but few remaining, are unable to do much of anything. If they do, they will be Tea Partied to death by people whose power of reasoning is weak.

Republicans’ explosive petard has blown a hole right through to the threatening abyss, and we could all be sucked through to racist nationalism. The first rule of tyranny is to create a scapegoat that can be blamed for everybody’s woes. Trump doesn’t sound markedly different from Hitler during the 1930s, when he was blaming Jews for Germany’s troubles.

There were a whole raft of Republican candidates for the presidency at first. Given their own illogical and incorrect statements and records, it doesn’t seem even controversial to say that not a single one of them was qualified to be president. Now we are narrowed to three, and there is no question about it; the three remaining are equally radical and destructive.

Republicans have no one to blame but themselves for this preposterous situation. What else could come of encouraging hatred and racism—which has been the unspoken dogwhistle policy since Nixon and Reagan—and failure to perform the constitutional duties of office. If I were the praying sort, I would ask for divine help in keeping all three GOP candidates out of the White House.

The solution, of course, is to elect a Democrat from the two decent leading candidates with actual impressive accomplishments under their belts, and who have not devoted the past seven years to opposing everything Republican just because they are Democrats. That would solve the immediate problem, but wouldn’t fix the GOP.

What is a thoughtful congressional GOP member to do, now that they have destroyed their own credibility and wasted our time and many millions of dollars with unswerving obstructionism and racism? A few of them at this date are either clearly endorsing a Democrat, or insinuating that it’s the only reasonable thing to do. Even they realize the political catastrophe that is Trump.

I have a proposal for the Republicans who have created this sorry state: begin today to actually perform the duties of your job. Your first constitutional duty is to debate and either approve or reject whoever Obama nominates for the Supreme Court. Then start on the seven-year backlog of judicial and administrative nominees. After that there are the laws you didn’t consider.

Form a caucus, a group to visit your congressional leaders, to point out the total disaster that Republican obstructionist policy has created. Suggest that maybe the next seven or eight months should be devoted to at least repairing the political bridges the party has dynamited. Pass a few laws that benefit the people you are supposed to be serving.

The alternative is to pretend you have done the right thing, and that the grand egotistical racist blowhard Donald Trump will be a great president.


The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://classwarinamerica.wordpress.com/2016/03/13/who-should-we-impeach-next/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

5 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. With the “informed” constituency supporting the GOP, it has been the very obstructions that have saved what little Obama hasn’t wrecked.


    • Please tell me what it is that Obama has wrecked. All the economic numbers are with him.


      • I was being facetious… though that really is what Republicans do say.

        On my side:
        Economics measurements are but manipulated numbers of how corporations are responding to the economy. I.E: asset owners. Not how individuals (workers) are affected by them. Jobs? 90% of them are part time, income increase? Negated by raising cost of living. Capitalist measurements don’t count negative externalities either. That’s left to the public sector to deal with. Corporations collect nearly all income while the public cleans up their mess (Effects of QE, Bailout of Banks, Clean up of environmental damages).

        Only corporations have been doing well for quite some time, they should love Obama’s numbers, as have they since Reagan. Same policies different facade.

        At face value the numbers are wonderful, when context is added they reveal a different story.
        In my opinion economic indexes are pure fantasy and completely disassociated from the average person. We should instead use indexes developed by Manfred Max Neef.

        Obama has been an expansion of neoliberal practices both domestically and abroad. Yet, he has managed to make it seem okay to hand the entire american population to the private sector (Obamacare); relinquish whatever relative privacy was there; prosecuted dissenters; made WallStreet it’s own regulator; abroad? Well, we are at perpetual war… then again, a republican would have destroyed all resemblances of social wellbeing by now. I suppose that’s the silver lining of a neoliberal democrat in office.

        Here is an article from Craig Roberts pointing out some of fallacies of the measurements. I didn’t really mean to use Roberts but, just happened to be one I recalled easily.


      • You’re too fast for me. Little to argue with in your comments, but Obamacare is private only because it’s the only possible way it could be passed.


      • Certainly agree with you. I would rather have the only possibility during this political climate than the previous.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s